11717 comments

• Comment Link Thursday, 28 November 2024 02:18 posted by 債券投資のデメリットは

  Lodging managers additionally be certain that clients are enjoying their stays, usually working round-the-clock to provide the ultimate travel experience.
• Comment Link Thursday, 28 November 2024 02:10 posted by chinese pinyin

  First of all I would like to say great blog! I had a quick question which I'd like to
  ask if you do not mind. I was interested to know how you center
  yourself and clear your head before writing. I have had difficulty clearing my mind in getting my ideas
  out. I do take pleasure in writing however it just seems like the first
  10 to 15 minutes are wasted just trying to figure out how to begin. Any recommendations or hints?
  Thank you!
• Comment Link Thursday, 28 November 2024 01:58 posted by Do Not Click

  Www.metal-archives.com/users/diviashop7
• Comment Link Thursday, 28 November 2024 01:58 posted by Verified Stripe

  https://id.kaywa.com/diviashop7
• Comment Link Thursday, 28 November 2024 01:54 posted by 視覚 過敏 チェック

  Morse then started periodic journey between California and Germany, the place now and again he remained for several weeks to work as a pub musician.
• Comment Link Thursday, 28 November 2024 01:44 posted by お笑い芸人離婚

  One unique and particular embellishment over the attire is ‘mundavlya’, which is worn by both bride and groom.
• Comment Link Thursday, 28 November 2024 01:36 posted by 바카라사이트

  Woah! I'm really digging the template/theme of this blog. It's simple, yet effective.
  A lot of times it's difficult to get that "perfect balance"
  between superb usability and visual appearance.
  I must say you have done a very good job with this. Also, the blog loads very fast for me on Safari.
  Exceptional Blog!
• Comment Link Thursday, 28 November 2024 01:24 posted by Aviator Game

  Thanks for creating this useful information!
• Comment Link Thursday, 28 November 2024 01:22 posted by ร้านดอกไม้ด่วน

  Do Greens and crossbenchers who claim that transparency and integrity is at the heart of
  their reason for entering Parliament in the first place hear themselves?
  
  
  In the past few days they have mounted self-serving arguments against proposed electoral
  reforms that the major parties look set to come together to support.
  
  
  The reforms include caps for how much money wealthy individuals can donate, caps on the amount candidates can spend in individual electorates to prevent the equivalent of an arms race, and a $90million limit on what any
  party can spend at an election - actually less than the major
  parties currently spend.
  
  The proposed new laws also include lower disclosure
  thresholds for donations, thus increasing the transparency of who
  makes political donations in the first place.
  
  So the wealthy wont be able to hide behind anonymity while using their cash to influence election outcomes - and the extent
  to which they can use their wealth at all will be limited.
  
  
  The bill will further improve transparency by also increasing the speed and frequency that disclosures of donations need to be made.
  
  
  At present we have the absurd situation in which
  donations get made - but you only find out the details of who has given what to whom many months later, well
  after elections are won and lost.
  
  In other words, what is broadly being proposed will result in much greater transparency and
  far less big money being injected into campaigning by the wealthy.
  
  
  
  
  
  Teal Kylea Tink claimed the major parties were 'running scared' with the policy and warned the reform would 'not stop the rot' 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Greens senate leader Larissa Waters (left) fired a warning shot - saying
  if it serves only the major parties 'it's a rort, not reform'. Teal independent ACT senator David Pocock (right) said:
  'What seems to be happening is a major-party stitch-up'
  
  Anyone donating more than $1,000 to a political
  party, as opposed to $16,000 under the current rules, will need to disclose having done so.
  And how much they can donate will be capped.
  
  
  Yet the Greens and Teals have quickly condemned the proposed new laws, labeling
  them a 'stitch-up', 'outrageous' and 'a rort, not a reform'. 
  
  They have lost their collective minds after finding out that Labor's proposal just might secure the support of the opposition.
  
  I had to double check who was criticising what exactly before
  even starting to write this column.
  
  Because I had assumed - incorrectly - that these important transparency measures stamping out the influence of
  the wealthy must have been proposed by the virtue-signalling Greens
  or the corruption-fighting Teals, in a united crossbench effort to drag the major parties closer to accountability.
  
  
  More fool me.
  
  The bill, designed to clean up a rotten system, is being put
  forward by Labor and is opposed by a growing cabal of crossbenchers.
  
  
  It makes you wonder what they have to hide.
  Put simply, the Greens and Teals doth protest too much on this issue.
  
  
  
  
  
  Labor is thought to be trying to muscle out major political
  donors such as Clive Palmer
  
  
  
  
  
  Another potential target of the laws is businessman and Teal funder Simon Holmes à Court
  
  
  
  
  
  The Greens have taken massive donations in the past, contrary to their irregular
  calls to tighten donations rules (Greens leader Adam Bandt and Senator Mehreen Faruqi are pictured)
  
  The major parties have long complained about the influence the likes
  of Simon Holmes à Court wields behind the scenes amongst the Teals. 
  
  And we know the Greens have taken massive donations from the wealthy in the past, contrary
  to their irregular calls to tighten donations rules.
  
  
  Now that tangible change has been proposed, these bastions of virtue are running a mile from reforms that will curtail dark art of political donations.
  
  
  The Labor government isn't even seeking for these
  transparency rules to take effect immediately, by the way.
  It won't be some sort of quick-paced power play before the next election designed to
  catch the crossbench out.
  
  They are aiming for implementation by 2026, giving everyone enough
  time to absorb and understand the changes before preparing for
  them.
  
  Don't get me wrong, no deal has yet been done between Labor and
  the Coalition. I imagine the opposition want to go over the laws with a
  fine tooth comb.
  
  As they should - because it certainly isn't beyond Labor
  to include hidden one-party advantages in the proposed design which would create loopholes only the unions are capable of taking advantage of, therefore disadvantaging the Coalition electorally in the years to come.
  
  
  But short of such baked-in trickiness scuttling a deal
  to get these proposed laws implemented, the crossbench should offer their support, not cynical opposition, to what is being advocated for.
  
  
  
  They might even be able to offer something worthwhile that could be incorporated in the package.
  
  
  To not do so exposes their utter hypocrisy and blowhard false commentary about being in politics to 'clean things
  up'.
• Comment Link Thursday, 28 November 2024 01:17 posted by 相続税対策 保険

  December 13, 1949 to Bruce & Catherine Higbee.