!Cognitive biases of the different stakeholders : Don't blame the data
As product managers, we rely heavily on gathering data in order to make product and business-related decisions. But even with the best intentions at heart, many times our decision-making is affected by inherent biases and preconceived notions - not by empirical data.
This is a universal pain across organizations.
In this talk, we will reveal the most prominent cognitive biases and explore mitigation tips to make better data-driven decisions. From Sales to Marketing and from Support to Dev we'll dive into each stakeholder, cover the most painful bias, explore how it affects the product, and how to deal with them.
Latest from Super User
11723 comments
-
Comment Link
Thursday, 28 November 2024 01:54 posted by 視覚 過敏 チェック
Morse then started periodic journey between California and Germany, the place now and again he remained for several weeks to work as a pub musician.
-
Comment Link
Thursday, 28 November 2024 01:44 posted by お笑い芸人離婚
One unique and particular embellishment over the attire is ‘mundavlya’, which is worn by both bride and groom.
-
Comment Link
Thursday, 28 November 2024 01:36 posted by 바카라사이트
Woah! I'm really digging the template/theme of this blog. It's simple, yet effective.
A lot of times it's difficult to get that "perfect balance"
between superb usability and visual appearance.
I must say you have done a very good job with this. Also, the blog loads very fast for me on Safari.
Exceptional Blog! -
Comment Link
Thursday, 28 November 2024 01:24 posted by Aviator Game
Thanks for creating this useful information!
-
Comment Link
Thursday, 28 November 2024 01:22 posted by ร้านดอกไม้ด่วน
Do Greens and crossbenchers who claim that transparency and integrity is at the heart of
their reason for entering Parliament in the first place hear themselves?
In the past few days they have mounted self-serving arguments against proposed electoral
reforms that the major parties look set to come together to support.
The reforms include caps for how much money wealthy individuals can donate, caps on the amount candidates can spend in individual electorates to prevent the equivalent of an arms race, and a $90million limit on what any
party can spend at an election - actually less than the major
parties currently spend.
The proposed new laws also include lower disclosure
thresholds for donations, thus increasing the transparency of who
makes political donations in the first place.
So the wealthy wont be able to hide behind anonymity while using their cash to influence election outcomes - and the extent
to which they can use their wealth at all will be limited.
The bill will further improve transparency by also increasing the speed and frequency that disclosures of donations need to be made.
At present we have the absurd situation in which
donations get made - but you only find out the details of who has given what to whom many months later, well
after elections are won and lost.
In other words, what is broadly being proposed will result in much greater transparency and
far less big money being injected into campaigning by the wealthy.
Teal Kylea Tink claimed the major parties were 'running scared' with the policy and warned the reform would 'not stop the rot'
Greens senate leader Larissa Waters (left) fired a warning shot - saying
if it serves only the major parties 'it's a rort, not reform'. Teal independent ACT senator David Pocock (right) said:
'What seems to be happening is a major-party stitch-up'
Anyone donating more than $1,000 to a political
party, as opposed to $16,000 under the current rules, will need to disclose having done so.
And how much they can donate will be capped.
Yet the Greens and Teals have quickly condemned the proposed new laws, labeling
them a 'stitch-up', 'outrageous' and 'a rort, not a reform'.
They have lost their collective minds after finding out that Labor's proposal just might secure the support of the opposition.
I had to double check who was criticising what exactly before
even starting to write this column.
Because I had assumed - incorrectly - that these important transparency measures stamping out the influence of
the wealthy must have been proposed by the virtue-signalling Greens
or the corruption-fighting Teals, in a united crossbench effort to drag the major parties closer to accountability.
More fool me.
The bill, designed to clean up a rotten system, is being put
forward by Labor and is opposed by a growing cabal of crossbenchers.
It makes you wonder what they have to hide.
Put simply, the Greens and Teals doth protest too much on this issue.
Labor is thought to be trying to muscle out major political
donors such as Clive Palmer
Another potential target of the laws is businessman and Teal funder Simon Holmes à Court
The Greens have taken massive donations in the past, contrary to their irregular
calls to tighten donations rules (Greens leader Adam Bandt and Senator Mehreen Faruqi are pictured)
The major parties have long complained about the influence the likes
of Simon Holmes à Court wields behind the scenes amongst the Teals.
And we know the Greens have taken massive donations from the wealthy in the past, contrary
to their irregular calls to tighten donations rules.
Now that tangible change has been proposed, these bastions of virtue are running a mile from reforms that will curtail dark art of political donations.
The Labor government isn't even seeking for these
transparency rules to take effect immediately, by the way.
It won't be some sort of quick-paced power play before the next election designed to
catch the crossbench out.
They are aiming for implementation by 2026, giving everyone enough
time to absorb and understand the changes before preparing for
them.
Don't get me wrong, no deal has yet been done between Labor and
the Coalition. I imagine the opposition want to go over the laws with a
fine tooth comb.
As they should - because it certainly isn't beyond Labor
to include hidden one-party advantages in the proposed design which would create loopholes only the unions are capable of taking advantage of, therefore disadvantaging the Coalition electorally in the years to come.
But short of such baked-in trickiness scuttling a deal
to get these proposed laws implemented, the crossbench should offer their support, not cynical opposition, to what is being advocated for.
They might even be able to offer something worthwhile that could be incorporated in the package.
To not do so exposes their utter hypocrisy and blowhard false commentary about being in politics to 'clean things
up'. -
Comment Link
Thursday, 28 November 2024 01:17 posted by 相続税対策 保険
December 13, 1949 to Bruce & Catherine Higbee.
-
Comment Link
Thursday, 28 November 2024 01:16 posted by выезд нарколога на дом
Hi colleagues, how is everything, and what you would like
to say about this article, in my view its actually
remarkable in favor of me. -
Comment Link
Thursday, 28 November 2024 01:13 posted by คําติดพวงหรีด
The Australian government has issued a stern warning to horror fans
flocking to cinemas to see the ultra-violent slasher film Terrifier 3, cautioning audiences about
its extreme content and disturbing themes.
The film, directed by Damien Leone, has drawn huge crowds
since it's release on October 10, as it continues the blood-soaked saga of
Art the Clown with more gruesome, stomach-churning scenes.
The movie has broken box office records as horror
enthusiasts are lured in by the film's reputation for intense violence and shock value.
The Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, and the Arts has warned Australian audiences to prepare for scenes of graphic violence, dismemberment and disturbing themes that go well
beyond typical horror fare.
The film includes brutal depictions of murder using a variety of weapons, from chainsaws to axes
and guns, resulting in explicit injury detail and copious
amounts of blood.
The warning also highlights that the movie portrays self-harm, cannibalism, animal
cruelty and violence involving children, pushing the boundaries of
what the most hardened horror fans has seen before.
One of the film's more controversial moments includes a scene of implied masturbation coupled with self-harm, along with a shower
scene that hints at sexual activity.
The Australian government has issued a stern warning to horror fans
flocking to cinemas to see the ultra-violent slasher film Terrifier 3, cautioning audiences about its extreme content and disturbing themes
The film, directed by Damien Leone, has drawn huge crowds
since it's release on October 10, as it continues the blood-soaked saga of Art
the Clown with more gruesome, stomach-churning scenes
In addition, male genital nudity and obscured shots of female breast and
buttock nudity have caused concern among viewers
and the classification board alike.
The film's R18+ rating in Australia is due to its high impact violence, blood, gore and explicit sexual content.
Despite these warnings, audiences have turned out in droves.
The Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, and the Arts has warned Australian audiences to prepare for scenes of
graphic violence, dismemberment and disturbing themes that go well beyond typical horror fare
Many cinema-goers in Sydney and Melbourne reportedly clapped and cheered during some of the film's most grotesque death scenes.
This latest instalment of the Terrifier franchise is a continuation of the sadistic horror unleashed by Art the Clown, a
character who has now become a modern horror icon for his relentless brutality.
In Terrifier 3, Art's reign of terror continues, once
again targeting Sienna Shaw who narrowly
survived his attacks in the previous movie.
Sienna, portrayed by actress Lauren LaVera,
takes on Art in a deadly showdown that is as gory as it is horrifying,
featuring scenes of decapitations, dismemberments and visceral body horror.
Read More
'Traumatising' horror sequel leaves two Perth moviegoers unconscious and one injured
The Terrifier franchise, which began in 2016, quickly gained a cult
following due to its extreme violence and over-the-top death scenes.
The first film, which saw Art the Clown mutilate a victim with a hacksaw, shocked audiences with its brutal kill sequences.
The sequel, Terrifier 2, went viral last year after reports emerged that viewers were fainting and
vomiting in cinemas due to its graphic content.
Now, with Terrifier 3, Leone has doubled down on the carnage, taking the gore to new, unsettling levels.
Despite Australia's strict film censorship laws, Terrifier 3 was approved for theatrical release with a strong
warning attached.
The film's notoriety has only heightened its appeal to horror fans,
who continue to fill cinemas across the country.
Earlier this month, two people fainted and fled for the exit when it hit a Perth
cinema for early previews.
According to multiple eye witness accounts, one young
woman badly injured herself after she fell down the cinema
stairs while fleeing the movie theatre.
'This is going to sound made up and I promise you it's not,
' Australian horror film critic Emma Clarke began her review of David Leone's controversial new
horror-slasher.
The Rotten Tomatoes verified critic said two people fainted right
in front of her during the screening she attended at Innaloo Cinemas in Perth over
the weekend.
The first fainted during the opening scene, she said in her film review shared to YouTube,
and the second nearer to the end of the two-house spectacle.
'Can you tell me... why did two people feint right in front of me during that film?' she said.
'Both trying to run down the stairs to get to the bathrooms because they felt so queasy.'
The horror film fanatic said she spoke to both people and tried to assist them
because she was seated directly behind them.
The first was a man, who left with a friend who came to check on him, and second Australian victim was a
young woman.
'This poor girl gashed her head open as
she fell down the stairs, I felt so bad for
her. I went and checked on her afterwards,' Clarke claimed.
'She did get help. She was with her friend. It really shook me
up too. It actually took me out of the film for the moment.'
The reviewer, who has been sharing her thoughts on scary movies for the past four
years, said she has never seen audience members have such a visceral reaction to a film.
Many cinema-goers in Sydney and Melbourne reportedly clapped and cheered during some of the film's most
grotesque death scenes
Clarke described the third installment of Leone's series — which is set
to open nationally on Thursday, October 11 — as ' fun, intense,
gory, disturbed, and over the top.'
'I'm not used to horror actually hurting people, so that was a
really strange experience,' she said.
'Before anyone says they're paid actors, I saw the girl and she had injuries.
They were both very young people. I feel really awful about it to be honest.'
'It was a very scary moment trying to help them out.'
SydneyMelbourne -
Comment Link
Thursday, 28 November 2024 01:06 posted by telegcam
Telegram 是一款主打隐私保护和高安全性的即时通讯应用,广泛支持全球用户。虽然 Telegram 没有发布专门的“中文版”,但其支持简体中文和繁体中文语言,用户可以通过设置轻松切换到中文界面。Telegram 提供了包括加密聊天、语音通话、文件传输、大型群组和频道等丰富的功能,并且支持跨平台同步,用户可以在手机、电脑等设备上无缝使用。https://www.telegcam.com
-
Comment Link
Thursday, 28 November 2024 01:02 posted by 退職 後 の 保険
Kitty flirts with David, and Christie grows jealous when she suspects that David is developing romantic emotions for Kitty.
Leave a comment
Make sure you enter all the required information, indicated by an asterisk (*). HTML code is not allowed.